About missing reviews
Matthias Saou
thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net
Mon Jan 8 13:59:27 UTC 2007
Jesse Keating wrote :
> On Sunday 31 December 2006 09:51, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Yeah, probably -- and some are from freshrpms afaics.
> >
> > Is it really worth the effort to search for all those informations?
>
> Yes, EVERY package must have an accountable review. This is the only way
> we'll be able to trust the package repository for downstream projects,
> otherwise each downstream project will need to do its own package reviews to
> ensure quality.
Fully agreed. Does anyone want to review all the packages that came
from freshrpms and never got a proper formal review? I'm pretty sure
some things have slipped through...
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2835.fc6
Load : 2.47 1.66 1.56
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list