CVE-2019-11287

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

ImportantImportant ImpactWhat does this mean?

Insights vulnerability analysis

View exposed systems

Description

A resource-consumption flaw was identified in the rabbitmq-server web management plugin. Utilizing a malicious 'X-Reason' HTTP header, a remote attacker could insert a malicious Erlang format string which will expand and consume heap memory, resulting in a crash. The highest threat from this vulnerability is system availability.

A resource-consumption flaw was identified in the rabbitmq-server web management plugin. Utilizing a malicious 'X-Reason' HTTP header, a remote attacker could insert a malicious Erlang format string which will expand and consume heap memory, resulting in a crash. The highest threat from this vulnerability is system availability.

Statement

Red Hat Ansible Tower and Red Hat CloudForms are not vulnerable as they do not expose the RabbitMQ management interface by default. In Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13, the management interface was not enabled by default. So, although the flaw code was packaged, its impact for this version has been lowered to Moderate.

Red Hat Ansible Tower and Red Hat CloudForms are not vulnerable as they do not expose the RabbitMQ management interface by default. In Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13, the management interface was not enabled by default. So, although the flaw code was packaged, its impact for this version has been lowered to Moderate.

Mitigation

This flaw can be mitigated by disabling the Web Management plugin: rabbitmq-plugins disable rabbitmq_management.

Additional information

  • Bugzilla 1783318: rabbitmq-server: "X-Reason" HTTP Header can be leveraged to insert a malicious string leading to DoS
  • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation
  • FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2019-11287

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
Red HatNVD

CVSS v3 Base Score

7.5

7.5

Attack Vector

Network

Network

Attack Complexity

Low

Low

Privileges Required

None

None

User Interaction

None

None

Scope

Unchanged

Unchanged

Confidentiality Impact

None

None

Integrity Impact

None

None

Availability Impact

High

High

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

What is a mitigation?

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.